When an accused individual comes before a judicial authority, what is at stake is the most basic of all rights—that of personal liberty. In applying the...
The Court set out neutral and objective framework principles to guide its adjudication of the case, reasoned closely and narrowly within those principles, and set out...
This is the last of three articles in which Gautam Bhatia analyses the judgments of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court...
This is the second of three articles in which Gautam Bhatia analyses the judgments of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court...
This is the first of three articles in which Gautam Bhatia analyses the judgments of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court...
What is at stake is one of the most unique contributions to global jurisprudence in recent times: a basic structure doctrine that is not substantive but...
By now, it is evident that the battle lines have been drawn, and the points of conflict are beginning to appear in a clearer fashion.
Both Courts were fairly clear that even the basic structure of the Constitution is amendable, but that conceptually, the procedure for amending it and for altering...
Katiba Institute adds to the growing comparative discussion around constitutional statutes and therefore ought to be keenly studied by students of comparative constitutional law.
The judgment of the Kenyan High Court joins a global constitutional conversation of how institutional inequalities within the family may be judicially redressed.
At its heart, the BBI Judgment is about power, and the judges in the majority believe that the constitution acts as a barrier against the concentration...
The IEBC is a Fourth Branch institution that – as the name suggests – is responsible for supervising elections and referenda, and for related matters such...