Connect with us

Op-Eds

We Will Revisit: Philomena Mwilu, the Sept 1 Ruling and the Noordin Haji Show

7 min read.

One year after Deputy Chief Justice, Philomena Mwilu led her colleagues in a historic ruling that nullified the August presidential election, is her arrest part of the Kenyatta State’s vendetta against a judiciary his regime still cannot control? By MIRIAM ABRAHAM

Published

on

We Will Revisit: Philomena Mwilu, the Sept 1 Ruling and the Noordin Haji Show
Download PDFPrint Article

It is the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court of Kenya’s historic ruling, nullifying the 2017 presidential election. We probably would have completely forgotten the day, but the arrest and prosecution of Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu, on corruption charges, a few days ago, rudely thrust us right back to that dark period last year.  It brought back memories of the day the President of the Republic of Kenya and his Deputy, openly insulted the Supreme Court Judges calling them wakora (Kenyan president, election overturned by court, attacks judiciary) and threatened that the State would ‘revisit’ the judges who had ruled in favour of the petition.

Although it may not be directly connected to the anniversary of the ruling of the Supreme Court, the Mwilu arrest has brought flashbacks of the mud-slinging that followed the Court’s verdict, not least, the persistent online bullying, probably led by Cambridge Analytica, with that memorable hashtag, #WakoraNetwork. The four Judges must have lived through a year of terror, the magnitude of which we we will only fully understand when they write their memoirs. As a victim of State terror myself, I can only imagine what their lives have been like. We should brace ourselves for more.

As I watched the news of the arrest of Lady Justice Mwilu, the events of last year flashed through my mind. I remembered clearly a telephone call on the morning of September 1, from a prominent politician. The call was to give me a heads-up on the decision of the Supreme Court,  which was set to be announced in four hours. I remember the words so clearly – “we tried everything to change the minds of the Judges, without success.” Lady Justice Mwilu was blamed by my caller for corralling her colleagues around their oath to protect and respect the Constitution. Chief Justice David Maraga was accused of being too much of a Seventh Day Adventist, quoting biblical verses to nudge the consciences of  those Judges that were still keen to serve the interests of their benefactors. The two were singled out as the ‘worst’, a term with which I was familiar: it had once been used to describe me, in a different context.

The four Judges must have lived through a year of terror, the magnitude of which we we will only fully understand when they write their memoirs. As a victim of State terror myself, I can only imagine what their lives have been like. We should brace ourselves for more.

And yet, a year after the sham 2017 elections, not a single individual has been prosecuted for the lives lost or the billions stolen. Instead, those that wilfully put the Supreme Court in a position to annul the result of the presidential vote continue to regale us with side-shows of ‘un-resigning’ and changing office locks to keep off opposing political camps from returning to work.  And then comes Mr. Noordin Haji, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), to further insult our intelligence by explaining to us in a sanctimonious statement, his reasons for going after the Deputy Chief Justice. We are now told that the Director of Criminal Investigations  (DCI) has suddenly discovered files from 2013, wherein Lady Justice Mwilu is accused of corruption, abuse office  and other offences. It begs the question of why she was cleared by the same agency that the DPP heads and by the DCI, for vetting for the highest Court in the land. And no, before you go there, it is not because we have the newly minted Mr. Noordin Haji, at the helm of the ODPP.  The reasons appear to be insidious.

Mr. Haji probably thinks that one year is enough for us to forget the words of President Uhuru Kenyatta of ‘revisiting’ the Judiciary after the elections. He must think that we have forgotten the chills we had as we watched the president, dishevelled, with bags under his eyes, angrily threaten the four Judges.  That we have forgotten the DCJ herself saying,  “we were threatened, that is for sure because I don’t know how to clothe a lie”, last month in Mombasa].Mr Haji forgets that we saw the engineered tabloid stories that were meant to embarrass the DCJ. He must think that we have forgotten that on October 24, 2017 the DCJ’s official driver was shot, a naked attempt to intimidate her from attending a Supreme Court session the following day, which would have likely postponed the sham October 26 presidential election.Or it could be that Mr Haji is merely confident that we have ‘moved-on’ in light of the muzzling of the media, restricted space for civil society and the Kenyatta-Odinga handshake.

I remembered clearly a telephone call on the morning of September 1, 2017 from a prominent politician. The call was to give me a heads-up on the decision of the Supreme Court,  which was set to be announced in four hours. I remember the words so clearly. We tried everything to change the minds of the Judges, without success. Lady Justice Mwilu was blamed by my caller for corralling her colleagues around their oath to protect and respect the Constitution.

This is by no means a defence of the integrity of Ms. Mwilu. Rather, it is questioning the real motive behind the charges against her and the timing. Having served in a Constitutional body, I know first-hand that our institutions are the epitome of cronyism and corruption. That is why they cannot possibly be independent. Despite the academic and professional credentials of the office holders, their selection, ultimately, is a product of high-level cronyism and corruption. This makes the office bearers vulnerable and prone to blackmail and all sorts of shenanigans. The Supreme Court has not been spared.

Stories abound of  delegations led by politicians to State House to ensure that “one of their own” is  appointed to the highest Court in the land, despite the fact that an ‘independent body’ is in charge of the process.  I know for a fact, that for each senior official appointed to sensitive institutions, there are persons assigned to “manage” him or her. These persons could range from close friends, family members – including what Americans would call Baby Mamas and Baby Daddies – politicians, ambassadors, members of the security institutions, name them. It is their job to make the difficult calls and visits, deliver ‘envelopes’, as well as threats, when the cajoling fails to work. Theirs is an unenviable situation, depending on their assigned target. They often end up being politically ostracized and on the ‘chopping board’, to use one political operator’s words, when the State Officer fails to ‘deliver’. But they are richly rewarded when they succeed.

Mr Haji must think that we have forgotten the chills we had as we watched the president, dishevelled, with bags under his eyes, angrily threaten the four Judges.  That we have forgotten the DCJ herself saying just last month in Mombasa:  “We were threatened, that is for sure because I don’t know how to clothe a lie.”

With this knowledge, I find it difficult to accept the arguments put forward by Mr. Haji, who owes his current position to cronyism. We have been through this before, we can see where it is headed. The ground has been softened in the past few months in the purported fight against corruption. A narrative has been created, consent has been sought and tacitly accepted by Kenyans. We have been made to believe that we are in Season Two of the fight against corruption. We have been reminded that both the big and the small fish will be fried. Why should we decry the arrest of the Deputy Chief Justice? Is she untouchable? Those are the questions that the regime will pose as they go after those that humiliated them last September by “taking away” their victory. It is the narrative that they will use as they prepare the ground for the 2022 presidential race or, if the Kenyatta-Odinga marriage works, a Putin-esque amendment of the Constitution to maintain both men in leadership positions nullifying the promise made to William Ruto in 2013.

And in this pursuit, the regime has found a new face in Mr. Noordin. With his previous service with ‘the men from the shadows’, as John Githongo calls them, he has a lot of political capital to leverage. Over the past few weeks he has been able to pull off fantastic public relations stunts. He has obviously mastered  the art of crisis management, by responding quickly, through a detailed written statement  , to control the story. As expected, the media reported verbatim from his statement, which was also carefully crafted to exploit the anger that Kenyans feel towards the difficult economic situation,  and to lay blame squarely on the doorstep of the DCJ – not the regime’s reckless economic policies of the past six years. He also made every effort to use the statement to portray ordinary Kenyans as victims of corruption, and his office as the long-awaited messiah.

The arrest and prosecution of Justice Mwilu was not presented in the same politically crude manner as  President Abdulla Yameen of the Maldives did in February when he ordered the arrest and indefinite detention of the Chief Justice and a judge of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had dismissed cases against opposition leaders, including former President Mohamed Nasheed.

The arrest and prosecution of Justice Mwilu was not presented in the same politically crude manner as  President Abdulla Yameen of the Maldives did in February when he ordered the arrest and indefinite detention of the Chief Justice and a judge of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had dismissed cases against opposition leaders, including former President Mohamed Nasheed.

Washington and London condemned President Yameen; the Maldives is not of sufficient strategic importance to Western interests for its leadership to get away with high authoritarian crimes. In President Kenyatta’s case, the new East-West global power contest will ensure that he will get a pat on the back and probably more State invitations to Western capitals. The President will brag to his benefactors, as he has done quite recently in a BBC Hardtalk interview, of the success of his “war on corruption”. He will evoke visions of a youthful President who has big dreams for his country – who is focused on his legacy and fixing the economy. Of a government that has taken charge of its domestic issues, including through the Kenyatta-Odinga marriage, and is destined for greater things, including a coveted seat at the United Nations Security Council. Bretton Woods will be fed reports of a government that has pulled all the stops to fight corruption without fear or favour, and is thus deserving of their assistance to fix the economic distress it finds itself in.To use the DPP’s  words, it is a government that is “prioritizing and being strategic in our actions so as to achieve the maximum possible impact in the shortest possible period”.

For now, the show continues.

Related Links

  1. Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu arrested over alleged graft
  2. Kenyan president, election overturned by court, attacks judiciary
  3. Maldives orders army to resist any Supreme Court impeachment order
  4. JSC meets in Nairobi over top judge’s graft case
  5. Supreme Court judge targeted in corruption purge
  6. Deputy CJ Philomena Mwilu’s driver shot in an attack along Ngong Road

Support The Elephant.

The Elephant is helping to build a truly public platform, while producing consistent, quality investigations, opinions and analysis. The Elephant cannot survive and grow without your participation. Now, more than ever, it is vital for The Elephant to reach as many people as possible.

Your support helps protect The Elephant's independence and it means we can continue keeping the democratic space free, open and robust. Every contribution, however big or small, is so valuable for our collective future.

Avatar
By

Ms. Abraham is a governance and institutional development expert.

Continue Reading

Op-Eds

Haiti: The Struggle for Democracy, Justice, Reparations and the Black Soul

Only the Haitian people can decide their own future. The dictatorship imposed by former president Jovenel Moïse and its imperialist enablers need to go – and make space for a people’s transition government.

Published

on

Haiti: The Struggle for Democracy, Justice, Reparations and the Black Soul
Download PDFPrint Article

Haiti is once again going through a profound crisis. Central to this is the struggle against the dictatorship imposed by former president Jovenel Moïse. Since last year Mr. Moise, after decreeing the dismissal of Parliament, has been ruling through decrees, permanently violating Haiti’s constitution. He has refused to leave power after his mandate ended on February 7, 2021, claiming that it ends on February 7 of next year, without any legal basis.

This disregard of the constitution is taking place despite multiple statements by the country’s main judicial bodies, such as the CSPJ (Superior Council of Judicial Power) and the Association of Haitian Lawyers. Numerous religious groups and numerous institutions that are representative of society have also spoken. At this time, there is a strike by the judiciary, which leaves the country without any public body of political power.

At the same time, this institutional crisis is framed in the insecurity that affects practically all sectors of Haitian society. An insecurity expressed through savage repressions of popular mobilizations by the PNH (Haitian National Police), which at the service of the executive power. They have attacked journalists and committed various massacres in poor neighborhoods. Throughout the country, there have been assassinations and arbitrary arrests of opponents.

Most recently, a judge of the High Court was detained under the pretext of promoting an alleged plot against the security of the State and to assassinate the president leading to the illegal and arbitrary revocation of three judges of this Court. This last period has also seen the creation of hundreds of armed groups that spread terror over the entire country and that respond to power, transforming kidnapping into a fairly prosperous industry for these criminals.

The 13 years of military occupation by United Nations troops through MINUSTAH and the operations of prolongation of guardianship through MINUJUSTH and BINUH have aggravated the Haitian crisis. They supported retrograde and undemocratic sectors who, along with gangsters, committed serious crimes against the Haitian people and their fundamental rights.

For this, the people of Haiti deserve a process of justice and reparations. They have paid dearly for the intervention of MINUSTAH: 30 THOUSAND DEAD from cholera transmitted by the soldiers, thousands of women raped, who now raise orphaned children. Nothing has changed in 13 years, more social inequality, poverty, more difficulties for the people. The absence of democracy stays the same.

The poor’s living conditions have worsened dramatically as a result of more than 30 years of neoliberal policies imposed by the International Financial Institutions (IFIs), a severe exchange rate crisis, the freezing of the minimum wage, and inflation above 20% during the last three years.

It should be emphasized that, despite this dramatic situation, the Haitian people remain firm and are constantly mobilizing to prevent the consolidation of a dictatorship by demanding the immediate leave of office by former President Jovenel Moïse.

Taking into account the importance of this struggle and that this dictatorial regime still has the support of imperialist governments such as the United States of America, Canada, France, and international organizations such as the UN, the OAS, and the EU, the IPA calls its members to contribute their full and active solidarity to the struggle of the Haitian people, and to sign this Petition that demands the end of the dictatorship as well as respect for the sovereignty and self-determination of the Haitian people, the establishment of a transition government led by Haitians to launch a process of authentic national reconstruction.

In addition to expressing our solidarity with the Haitian people’s resistance, we call for our organisations to demonstrate in front of the embassies of the imperialist countries and before the United Nations. Only the Haitian people can decide their future. Down with Moise and yes to a people’s transition government, until a constituent is democratically elected.

Continue Reading

Op-Eds

Deconstructing the Whiteness of Christ

While many African Christians can only imagine a white Jesus, others have actively promoted a vision of a brown or black Jesus, both in art and in ideology.

Published

on

Deconstructing the Whiteness of Christ
Download PDFPrint Article

When images of a white preacher and actor going around Kenya playing Jesus turned up on social media in July 2019, people were rightly stunned by the white supremacist undertone of the images. They suggested that Africans were prone to seeing Jesus as white, promoting the white saviour narrative in the process. While it is true that the idea of a white Jesus has been prevalent in African Christianity even without a white actor, and many African Christians and churches still entertain images of Jesus as white because of the missionary legacy, many others have actively promoted a vision of Jesus as brown or black both in art an in ideology.

Images of a brown or black Jesus is as old as Christianity in Africa, especially finding a prominent place in Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which has been in existence for over sixteen hundred years. Eyob Derillo, a librarian at the British Library, recently brought up a steady diet of these images on Twitter. The image of Jesus as black has also been popularised through the artistic project known as Vie de Jesus Mafa (Life of Jesus Mafa) that was conducted in Cameroon.

The most radical expression of Jesus as a black person was however put forth by a young Kongolese woman called Kimpa Vita, who lived in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century. Through the missionary work of the Portuguese, Kimpa Vita, who was a nganga or medicine woman, became a Christian. She taught that Jesus and his apostles were black and were in fact born in São Salvador, which was the capital of the Kongo at the time. Not only was Jesus transposed from Palestine to São Salvador, Jerusalem, which is a holy site for Christians, was also transposed to São Salvador, so that São Salvador became a holy site. Kimpa Vita was accused of preaching heresy by Portuguese missionaries and burnt at the stake in 1706.

It was not until the 20th century that another movement similar to Vita’s emerged in the Kongo. This younger movement was led by Simon Kimbangu, a preacher who went about healing and raising the dead, portraying himself as an emissary of Jesus. His followers sometimes see him as the Holy Spirit who was to come after Jesus, as prophesied in John 14:16. Just as Kimpa Vita saw São Salvador as the new Jerusalem, Kimbangu’s village of Nkamba became, and still is known as, the new Jerusalem. His followers still flock there for pilgrimage. Kimbangu was accused of threatening Belgian colonial rule and thrown in jail, where he died. Some have complained that Kimbangu seems to have eclipsed Jesus in the imagination of his followers for he is said to have been resurrected from the dead, like Jesus.

Kimbangu’s status among his followers is however similar to that of some of the leaders of what has been described as African Independent Churches or African Initiated Churches (AICs). These churches include the Zionist churches of Southern Africa, among which is the amaNazaretha of Isaiah Shembe. Shembe’s followers see him as a divine figure, similar to Jesus, and rather than going to Jerusalem for pilgrimage, his followers go to the holy city of Ekuphakameni in South Africa. The Cameroonian theologian, Fabien Eboussi Boulaga, in his Christianity Without Fetish, see leaders like Kimbangu and Shembe as doing for their people in our own time what Jesus did for his people in their own time—providing means of healing and deliverance in contexts of grinding oppression. Thus, rather than replacing Jesus, as they are often accused of doing, they are making Jesus relevant to their people. For many Christians in Africa, therefore, Jesus is already brown or black. Other Christians still need to catch up with this development if we are to avoid painful spectacles like the one that took place Kenya.

This post is from a partnership between Africa Is a Country and The Elephant. We will be publishing a series of posts from their site once a week.

Continue Reading

Op-Eds

In Magufuli’s Shadow: The Stark Choices Facing Tanzania’s New President

One immediate concern is what steps Hassan will take on the pandemic, and whether she will change direction.

Published

on

In Magufuli’s Shadow: The Stark Choices Facing Tanzania’s New President
Photo: Flickr/Gospel Kitaa
Download PDFPrint Article

The sudden death of Tanzania’s President John Pombe Magufuli has thrown the East African nation into a period of political uncertainty.

Vice-president, Samia Suluhu Hassan, has been sworn in as his successor, making her Tanzania’s first woman president.

The transition is all the more challenging given the major rupture – both political and economic – caused by Magufuli’s presidency. Magufuli, who won a second term in October 2020, dramatically centralised power and pursued an interventionist economic policy agenda. He courted controversy on a number of fronts, most recently, by claiming that Tanzania – contrary to mounting evidence – was Covid-free.

Hassan has called for unity and counselled that now is not the time to look at what has passed but rather to look at what is to come.

Despite the 61-year-old leader’s forward-looking stance, questions remain about how Magufuli’s legacy will shape her time in office.

The authoritarian turn

Magufuli oversaw the marginalisation of opposition parties and a decline in civil liberties. His first term was defined by heightened intimidation and violence against opposition leaders, including disappearances and physical attacks.

Thanks to five years of repression, the October 2020 general elections saw the opposition all but wiped out of elected office. The ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi now controls all local government councils. It also holds 97% of directly elected legislative seats, up from 73% in 2015.

In addition, media freedom and civil liberties were also restricted. A law passed in 2018 imposed jail terms for questioning the accuracy of official statistics.

But Magufuli’s authoritarian tendencies were not unprecedented in Tanzania. For instance, the rule of his predecessor Jakaya Kikwete was also marred by human rights abuses as well civil society and media repression. Kikwete also cancelled Zanzibar’s 2015 election due to a likely opposition victory.

It remains to be seen whether Hassan will adopt a more liberal approach, loosening restrictions on opposition parties, the media and civil society. Even if she does, the damage will take time to repair. Opposition parties, for instance, may well struggle to regain their strength. Among other setbacks, they have lost almost all local elected representatives – a core element of their organisational infrastructure built up painstakingly over decades.

Centralising power in the party

Another key pillar to Magufuli’s legacy is the centralisation of power within the Chama Cha Mapinduzi.

In the early years under founding president Julius Nyerere, Tanzania’s ruling party was dominated by the president and a hierarchy of appointed state and party officials. But, following economic liberalisation in the 1980s and Nyerere’s retirement from politics, the party became steeped in factional rivalries. These were spurred by new political alliances and an emerging private sector business elite.

This factionalism reached its height under Kikwete amid accusations of widespread corruption. Magufuli’s nomination as party presidential candidate only occurred because the rivalry among these factions left him as the unexpected compromise candidate.

Once in office, though, Magufuli quickly signalled he would be nobody’s puppet. He used his position as ruling party chairman to create a “new” Chama Cha Mapinduzi. This involved breaking with party heavyweights, including Kikwete, suppressing factional organising, and consolidating his own support base.

Magufuli’s new base was a cohort of freshly appointed party officials as well as civil servants and cabinet ministers. His loyalists likened these changes to a revival of Nyerere’s Chama Cha Mapinduzi. But, in our view, the comparison is misleading.

Like Magufuli before her, Hassan will be taking office – and party leadership – without her own political base. She will also have to contend with revived factional manoeuvring as sidelined groups try to regain an upper hand.

Hassan could align with a loyal Magufuli faction, which includes influential figures within the party. But, early indications suggest she intends to follow the advice of “party elders”, notably Kikwete. The former president reportedly attended the party’s most recent central committee meeting on Hassan’s invitation.

Aligning herself with Kikwete will likely lead to the reemergence of the internal factional rivalries that characterised the former president’s tenure.

Implications for economic policy

If president Hassan does continue to take a political steer from Kikwete, one likely outcome is that there will be a change in economic policy. In particular, a return to growth that’s led by a more business-friendly approach to the private sector.

Calls are already being made for such a course of action..

The danger for Hassan, however, is that under Kikwete this model was associated with high levels of corruption and unproductive rent-seeking.

A careful reassessment of the Magufuli era is needed to guide future policymaking.

Magufuli used his control over the ruling party to pursue an ambitious policy agenda. This was also linked to his political project of centralising power.

Although this trend actually began under Kikwete, Magufuli accelelrated a move towards more state-led investment. Under his leadership, both state-owned and, increasingly, military-owned enterprises were offered strategic contracts.

This ambitious programme initially won him praise. But over time, his authoritarian decision-making, mismanagement, and lack of transparency prompted a more critical response.

Many state enterprises remained cash-starved, relied on government financial support, and registered losses.

When the government’s controller and auditor general called for more scrutiny of public finances, his budget was slashed. And he was ultimately forced to retire and replaced by a Magufuli loyalist.

Alongside state investment, the president also sought to discipline private sector actors. Some observers suggest that this led to more productive investment, notably by domestic investors. But others point to renewed crony capitalist ties.

Magufuli’s most high profile corporate battle was against Canadian-owned Barrick Gold and its former subsidiary, Acacia Mining. From the two, he demanded USD$190 billion in tax arrears and a renegotiation of operating terms.

Many saw this resource-nationalist approach as an inspiration and a model for African countries seeking to take greater control of their mineral wealth. But in the end – partly due to externally imposed legal and economic constraints – Magufuli walked back on some of his demands. Instead he opted for cooperation rather than confrontation.

He negotiated a joint venture in which Barrick took a majority stake of 84% and Tanzania the remaining 16%. Key elements of the nationalistic mining legislation passed in 2017 were also reversed.

On the plus side gold overtook tourism as Tanzania’s biggest foreign-exchange earner. In addition, some small-scale miners saw their livelihoods improve. Results were more mixed elsewhere, especially for Tanzanite miners in the country’s north.

Ultimately, Magufuli leaves behind a mixed economic legacy. It combines misdirected authoritarian decision-making with positive efforts to pursue an active industrial policy. Reining in unproductive domestic investors and renegotiating adverse contracts with foreign investors were part of this agenda.

There is a risk, given this complex mix, that Tanzania’s policymakers may learn the wrong lessons from his presidency, leading back to the flawed model existing before.

Significantly, neither Magufuli nor his predecessors managed to achieve more inclusive growth. For this reason poverty levels have remained stubbornly high.

The pandemic and beyond

One immediate concern is what steps Hassan will take on the pandemic, and whether she will change direction.

Whatever she does, the health emergency and associated economic crisis will likely define her presidency. It could indeed define the economic trajectory of the African region in years to come.

Both Kikwete and Magufuli ruled through an economic boom period. Commodity prices were high and access to international finance was fairly easy. This gave them latitude to choose between various development approaches.

If Tanzania reverts to the status quo of the Kikwete years, the risk is a reemergence of rent-seeking but without the same highly favourable economic growth conditions. Indeed, as external conditions worsen, Hassan may find her options far more limited.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Trending