When an accused individual comes before a judicial authority, what is at stake is the most basic of all rights—that of personal liberty. In applying the...
The question of how property should be shared out between a divorcing couple remains vexed. We need laws and rulings that reflect our realities, not somebody...
The Court set out neutral and objective framework principles to guide its adjudication of the case, reasoned closely and narrowly within those principles, and set out...
This is the first of three articles in which Gautam Bhatia analyses the judgments of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court...
The Kadhi court has been part of Kenya's legal architecture, but it tends to be misunderstood by Muslims and non-Muslims, and thus controversies. A more nuanced...
What is at stake is one of the most unique contributions to global jurisprudence in recent times: a basic structure doctrine that is not substantive but...
The 2010 Constitution requires that not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender. Article 170, which...
Katiba Institute adds to the growing comparative discussion around constitutional statutes and therefore ought to be keenly studied by students of comparative constitutional law.
Cartoons
The Court of Appeal on Friday, August 20 ruled that President Uhuru Kenyatta’s attempt to change the Constitution through the BBI process was unconstitutional. Constitutional lawyer...
Cartoons