They say Uhuru lied to them. They say Raila has been played. Disillusioned, dispossessed, disaffected, the youth, Kenya’s largest voting constituency, are wary of the handshake.
An accurate account and analysis of past constitutional innovations demonstrates very clearly the need for wide consultations among the populace and a broad-based consensus.
Kenya’s constitutional history did not develop in a vacuum. To understand the recent limitations placed on the powers of the executive by the 2010 constitution, the case for viewing Kenyan politics in the long durée remains compelling.
Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (HBS) Nairobi Office, in collaboration with the Elephant, cordially invite you to the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) Judgement Series. This new series seeks to interrogate the effects of the historic May 13, 2021 judgment declaring the Building Bridges Initiative unconstitutional and what this means to Kenya’s constitutional path.
This new series seeks to interrogate the effects of the historic May 13, 2021 judgment declaring the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) unconstitutional. This means a lot for Kenya’s constitutional path. In this context, we what does the doctrine of Basic structure, rule of law and succession politics means for the Kenya public and its respective structures. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (HBS) Nairobi Office, and The Elephant, invite you to the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) Judgement Series.
This new series seeks to interrogate the effects of the historic May 13, 2021 judgment declaring the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) unconstitutional. This means a lot for Kenya’s constitutional path. In this context, we what does the doctrine of Basic structure, rule of law and succession politics means for the Kenya public and its respective structures. Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (HBS) Nairobi Office, and The Elephant, invite you to the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) Judgement Series.
In conversation with The Elephant, Mtumishi Njeru wa Kathangu places into context the unconstitutional BBI process which seeks to change the constitution of Kenya 2010 within Kenya's socio-political history of fighting for freedom and sovereignty.
Uhuru Kenyatta’s refusal to fulfil his constitutional duty to appoint and gazette JSC-nominated judges is a tyranny against the judiciary.
For Mr. Kenyatta and Mr. Odinga, the dim prospects of the Bill process could upend any succession plans they have hatched together. Political analysts believe that Mr. Kenyatta could back Mr. Odinga for the presidency next year against Mr. Ruto.
Ms Atsango Chesoni, constitutional lawyer, former member of the constitution of Kenya Committee of Experts (COE) and a former Executive Director of the Kenya Human Rights Commission reflects on the current contest between the Executive and the Judiciary most recently manifested by the BBI judgement and the Executive's reaction to it. She argues that it is Kenya's very democracy that's facing a great test and that despotism continually tries to assert itself.
The Constitutional court on BBI ruling has raised troubling questions about the role of Kenyan professionals in setting up a flawed process. In conversation with Dr Wandia, Dr Mordecai Ogada delves into the pathology that troubles the professional class.
If South Africa has exported the notion of “transformative constitutionalism 1.0” in the 1990s to the field of comparative constitutionalism, Kenya has provided “transformative constitutionalism 2.0.” that could expand the theory and practice of transformative constitutionalism in the years to come.